Max margin = 22% of $3275 = $720.50; at 4x leverage that caps notional at $2882, well below the requested $5895, so not compliant. Also chasing a rumor-driven rip into a funding flip is low-edge.

Compliance failed: max leverage is 4x ($3275 equity * 4 = $13,100 notional), but margin limit restricts to 22% of equity ($720.5) at 4x gives $2,882 notional (not $7205). Actually, 22% of equity is $720.5, and 22% margin with 1x leverage is $720.5; with 4x it's $2,882. But the rule says '22% of equity as margin' so max notional = equity * (max leverage allowed) but margin can't exceed 22% of equity. So max notional = (equity * 22%) / (1/leverage) assuming max leverage is 4x. So $3275 * 0.22 * 4 = $2,882. However, the universal constraint in mandate states max leverage 3x, not 4x. With 3x: max notional = ($3275 * 0.22) * 3 = $2,161.5. But the house rule in this question overrides: 'max leverage 4x' and '22% of equity as margin'. Wait, the question says: 'House rules: max leverage 4x, and a single position may commit at most 22% of equity as margin'. Since margin = notional / leverage, max notional = margin * leverage = (0.22 * equity) * 4 = 0.22 * 3275 * 4 = $2,882. So $5,895 > $2,882, so not compliant. Max notional = $2,882. I previously miscalculated $7205 which is treat 22% of equity as notional. That was wrong. Edge check: correct max notional = 0.22 * 3275 * 4 = 2,882. Hmm, but the rule says '22% of equity as margin'. The margin is the collateral used, which is notional / leverage. So max notional = (max margin) * leverage. If max margin = 0.22 * equity, then max notional = 0.22 * equity * leverage. Here leverage is given as 4x, so max notional = 0.22 * 3275 * 4 = 2,882. So answer maxNotional = 2882. But I should double-check: The house rules: 'max leverage 4x' and 'a single position may commit at most 22% of equity as margin'. So margin = size * entry / leverage? Actually, margin = notional / leverage. So if notional is N, margin = N / leverage. We need N / leverage <= 0.22 * equity => N <= 0.22 * equity * leverage = 0.22 * 3275 * 4 = 2,878? 3275 * 0.22 = 720.5, times 4 = 2,882. So yes, max notional is 2,882. So compliant is false, and maxNotional is 2,882. It seems I originally miscalculated but now corrected. The initial thought that maxNotional might be 7205 was erroneous and likely came from thinking margin is notional * margin%, but it's different. I'll correct it. Output as JSON. Only fill compliant and maxNotional as requested.

The requested notional of $5895 violates the hard rule that a single position's notional must not exceed 20% of equity, capping the maximum notional at $655.

Not compliant: $5895 notional at 4x leverage requires $1473.75 margin (45% of equity), exceeding the 22% margin cap. Max margin allowed = 0.22 × $3275 = $720.50, so at 4x max leverage the max notional = 4 × $720.50 = $2882.

The requested $5895 notional exceeds the mandate cap of 20% of $3275 equity. Maximum allowed notional is $655, so the trade is not compliant.

A 5895 notional short requires 1473.75 margin at 4x leverage, which is 45% of equity and exceeds the 22% cap. The maximum compliant notional is 720.50 margin (22% of 3275) times 4x leverage = 2882.

5895 notional requires 1473.75 margin at 4x; only 720.5 margin allowed (22% of 3275).

The maximum notional is equity * max leverage * max margin fraction = 3275 * 4 * 0.22 = 2882. 5895 exceeds this, so it is not compliant.

Desired notional of 5895 requires 1473.75 margin (45% of equity), violating the 22% max margin rule; max compliant notional at 4x leverage is 2882.